Blockchain

Story: Charles Hoskinson on Cardano (ADA) Explicitly Inviting For Governance Voting

By Steven Anderson

1 / 11

Lex Fridman:  So, you did say, the success of Cardano, the division you have, is for you to have less and less power over time.

2 / 11

The first thing you have to do is you got to look at meaningful metrics, not vanity metrics. So, what does it mean to have legitimacy in a Governance System?

3 / 11

In a peer democracy, where everything that the person votes, nothing ever gets done. So, there is a spectrum there between absolute power to one and perfectly Egalitarian power…

4 / 11

And then the question is okay. Well how do you have a choice of the architecture?  Are you asking your people about every question or you are asking your people about a…

5 / 11

For example are they ready to change the tax rate, but they can’t change freedom of speech, that kind of a thing.

6 / 11

In Bitcoin we had Bitcoin Talk, Bitcoin Reddit and these things and eventually they get a place to go if you are interested.

7 / 11

You need some sort of change in management system. Where people who want to evolve the system can write it down in a very careful way.

8 / 11

Then, there is a question of do you want to do it implicitly or explicitly.  In the case of Bitcoin and Ethereum, it is an implicit system.

9 / 11

In the case of Cardano, we are actually explicitly inviting.  This is one of the biggest differentiators between Cardano, Polkadot, and EOS.

10 / 11

So, in Cardano some of the inflation goes to the block producers just any other cryptocurrency.

11 / 11

What is nice thing is absolute participation. So, increase the amount of people whole hold ADA participating.  So, the absolute number of people participating.

The Currency Analytics

Want the full story?