Blockchain

Story: IOTA on the Theoritical Side of Mana and Delegated Access on the Blockchain Technology

By Dan Saada

1 / 12

IOTA Mana to Delegate Access

2 / 12

IOTA believes in that it is important for them to succeed by bringing their technology closer to their community.

3 / 12

IOTA 2.0 talks very frequently of Mana.  It is important for users to understand its implementation and for those who do not know to get to know of Mana.

4 / 12

The IOTA blog clarifies that the basic requirement of every DLT is to have Sybil protection and also congestion control. Mana fulfills these needs.

5 / 12

Sybil protection will prevents the attacker from gaining undue influence over the network by making use of multiple identities.

6 / 12

Mana can be best looked at as a tool who has different roles to play in the network. Mana is separated from the IOTA token, but it is related to IOTA.

7 / 12

The key to get Mana is to convince a token holder to pledge it; therefore, Mana is a Delegated Proof of Token Ownership.

8 / 12

Mana works like a Sybil Control Mechanism in the Congestion Control algorithm.

9 / 12

The amount of Mana held in a node determines the numbers of messages it can issue with reference to the total network throughput.

10 / 12

The pledging process takes place twice.  Once will be for the modules when they deal with the consensus and for the congestion control.

11 / 12

Sydney Ifergan, the crypto expert tweeted:  “IOTA facilitates the freedom to allocate access suitable to the economic interests of the users.”

12 / 12

With Mana the token holder will be able to delegate their access without having to delegate any additional “weight” on the consensus process.

The Currency Analytics

Want the full story?