Finance News
By Steven Anderson
1 / 12
Ripple (XRP) Different from Other Public Blockchains
2 / 12
Decentralized infrastructure, modernized messaging, and liquidity solutions are the important RippleNet Capabilities.
3 / 12
RippleNet and XRP are different. RippleNet being a payment network does not move money.
4 / 12
Sydney Ifergan, the crypto expert tweeted: “Ripple (XRP) Engineering team have interestingly come forward to quantify the environmental impact of payments systems, which is…
5 / 12
It is interesting to see that the efforts of Ripple are aligned to the goals of the IMFnews.
6 / 12
Some feel they are focusing more on the environment and that they need to spend more time bringing utility to XRP so that the community can cash out.
7 / 12
David Schwartz stated that XRPLwas designed to be fundamentally different from other public blockchains - and for good reason.
8 / 12
He also pointed to how consensus also better protects against the double-spend problem and unintentional forking and also on how this is why development of XRPL’s consensus…
9 / 12
He also cited: One example of this is Negative UNL, which was recently proposed to ensure improved decentralization and resilience of the XRPL doesn’t come at the cost of…
10 / 12
He clarified with a comparison stating, unlike what ETH has been trying to attempt in its move to PoS, Negative UNL would dramatically improve the consensus mechanism WITHOUT…
11 / 12
Concluded stating that pending public testing, we could see Negative UNL functionality introduced for review in the XRPL2 release.
12 / 12
By clarification, "safe forward progress" it can mean ledgers closing (safer) or the network developing in new ways (evolve) as well.
The Currency Analytics
Want the full story?