Altcoins News

Story: Why Judge Denied Ripple and SEC Motion in XRP Case: Lawyer Offers Two Explanations

By Dan Saada

1 / 15

Background: Ripple and SEC Attempted to Modify $125M Penalty. Ripple and the SEC jointly filed a motion seeking to revise the final judgment in their case,…

2 / 15

Lawyer Offers Two Bold Theories. Attorney Fred Rispoli took to social media platform X on June 25 to share his take on the court’s…

3 / 15

What the Ruling Means for Ripple and XRP. Despite the court’s rejection, Rispoli believes the end of the legal battle may be near.

4 / 15

Injunction Doesn’t Impact XRP on Secondary Markets. One point of clarity is that the court's ruling—and the standing injunction—does not affect XRP…

5 / 15

Judge Torres Cites Lack of Legal Grounds. In her ruling, Judge Torres reaffirmed that neither Ripple nor the SEC presented adequate…

6 / 15

Conclusion: Legal Closure Still in Sight. The Ripple and SEC motion rejection marks a symbolic moment in one of crypto’s most watched legal…

7 / 15

The long-running legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took another unexpected turn this week, as Judge Analisa Torres refused a joint…

8 / 15

Ripple and the SEC jointly filed a motion seeking to revise the final judgment in their case, requesting relief from a $125 million civil penalty and a permanent injunction…

9 / 15

However, Judge Torres denied the request, stating that the motion failed to present the “exceptional circumstances” required to alter a final judgment.

10 / 15

Attorney Fred Rispoli took to social media platform X on June 25 to share his take on the court’s decision. He pointed to two possible motivations behind Judge Torres’ firm stance:

11 / 15

“One, she was pissed that the parties wasted 4.5 years of her time with bitter litigation. This reason is 100% in play.”

12 / 15

Rispoli’s first theory suggests the judge may be frustrated with the lengthy nature of the case, which began in 2020 and has seen multiple twists and high-profile statements.

13 / 15

“Two, she is hostile to the Trump administration and will do what she can to throw up obstacles. This reason is 100% in play for some federal judges …”

14 / 15

Rispoli’s second explanation attributes potential political bias, speculating that Judge Torres might be opposed to the Trump administration’s pro-crypto stance.

15 / 15

Despite the court’s rejection, Rispoli believes the end of the legal battle may be near. He suggested that although the SEC previously signaled it might drop its appeal, the move…

The Currency Analytics

Want the full story?