Ripple Pushes Back Against SEC’s Appeal Bid in Ongoing Legal Showdown

In the protracted legal skirmish between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Ripple’s legal team has mounted a robust defense against the SEC’s pursuit of an interlocutory appeal. This latest development underscores the complexity and high stakes of the crypto courtroom drama. Let’s delve into the specifics of Ripple’s opposition to the SEC’s appeal maneuver.

A Clash of Legal Titans

Ripple has lodged its opposition to the SEC’s quest for an interlocutory appeal, a move that could potentially reshape the trajectory of this contentious legal battle. The heart of the matter revolves around the SEC’s allegation that Ripple, the San Francisco-based blockchain payments company, violated securities laws by making its digital asset, XRP, available to retail traders through various exchanges.

In a recent legal filing presented to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Ripple’s legal representatives presented a compelling argument against the SEC’s appeal bid. They contended that the SEC’s rationale for pursuing an appeal predominantly stems from its dissatisfaction with the judge’s ruling, which concluded that XRP does not inherently qualify as a security. Moreover, they emphasized that the stringent criteria for permitting an interlocutory appeal, often reserved for exceptional circumstances, have not been met in this case.

Challenging the Appeal’s Merit

Ripple’s legal team went further to assert that the SEC had not even made a concerted effort to meet the standard required for a stay, a request to halt the legal proceedings temporarily. This stance was taken even after the Individual Defendants, namely Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse and Executive Chairman Chris Larsen, pointed out this omission in their pre-motion letter. Ripple united with the opposition to the SEC’s appeal request, advocating for the judge to dismiss any appeal request or stay.

The SEC’s decision to pursue an interlocutory appeal, unveiled in August, was justified by the regulatory body as necessary due to the potential far-reaching implications of the Ripple lawsuit on other pending cases involving prominent cryptocurrency trading entities. The SEC argued that this appeal was warranted because it pertained to pivotal legal questions with substantial grounds for disagreement.

The Road Ahead

This latest legal twist is just one chapter in the ongoing courtroom saga between Ripple and the SEC, which commenced when the regulatory agency filed a lawsuit against the fintech company in December 2020. The SEC’s allegations centered on Ripple and its top executives raising $1.3 billion through the sale of XRP tokens, which they deemed unregistered securities.

As the legal battle rages on, the crypto community watches closely. XRP holders’ attorney, John E. Deaton, has expressed skepticism regarding the likelihood of the SEC’s appeal request being granted. The future of Ripple and XRP remains uncertain in the hands of the American judicial system.

At the time of writing, XRP is trading at $0.5015, experiencing a seven-day decline of approximately 4.8%. The crypto market continues to sway in the winds of regulatory uncertainty, with Ripple’s legal battle occupying a prominent position on this ever-evolving landscape.