Home Altcoins News Celsius Files Lawsuit Against StakeHound Over Alleged Failure to Return $150 Million in Cryptocurrencies

Celsius Files Lawsuit Against StakeHound Over Alleged Failure to Return $150 Million in Cryptocurrencies

In a recent development, bankrupt crypto lender Celsius has taken legal action against liquid staking platform StakeHound, alleging that the platform failed to return cryptocurrencies valued at over $150 million. The dispute centers around the custody and exchange of assets between the two parties.

According to court filings, Celsius entrusted StakeHound with a significant amount of cryptocurrencies in 2021. This included 25,000 staked native ETH, 35,000 native ETH, 40 million MATIC (the native token of the Polygon network), and 66,000 DOT (the native token of the Polkadot network). In return, StakeHound issued its liquid staking “stTokens” to Celsius.

However, a court docket filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York reveals that StakeHound filed an arbitration agreement against Celsius in Switzerland following the lender’s bankruptcy. In the arbitration filing, StakeHound argued that it has “no obligation” to exchange the stTokens for the original tokens entrusted by Celsius. Furthermore, StakeHound claimed that it had lost the keys associated with the 35,000 Celsius ETH and therefore should be relieved of its obligation to return these tokens.

Celsius has responded by asserting that the arbitration filing by StakeHound violates Section 362 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. This section, commonly known as the “automatic stay,” prohibits most creditors from pursuing debt collection or initiating legal proceedings against a debtor once they have filed for bankruptcy.

The legal dispute between Celsius and StakeHound highlights the challenges and complexities surrounding the custody and exchange of cryptocurrencies. As the crypto industry continues to evolve, ensuring the secure and reliable transfer of digital assets remains a critical concern for participants.

Celsius’s lawsuit against StakeHound seeks the return of the cryptocurrencies entrusted to the platform, along with any associated damages. The outcome of this legal battle will likely have implications for the broader crypto lending and custody space, as it raises important questions about the rights and responsibilities of custodial platforms.

As the case unfolds, it will be closely monitored by industry participants and observers. The resolution of this dispute may provide valuable insights into the legal framework surrounding cryptocurrencies and the accountability of custodians.

The incident involving Celsius and StakeHound underscores the importance of due diligence when choosing custodial platforms for digital assets. Investors and users should carefully assess the reputation, security measures, and track record of custodians before entrusting them with their cryptocurrencies.

In the crypto industry, custody solutions play a vital role in safeguarding digital assets. Custodial platforms are responsible for storing and securing cryptocurrencies on behalf of their clients. These platforms often employ various security measures, including cold storage and multi-signature wallets, to protect the assets from unauthorized access and potential theft.

However, despite these security measures, incidents like the one involving Celsius and StakeHound demonstrate that risks still exist in the custody of digital assets. The loss of private keys or technical issues can lead to the loss of access to the stored cryptocurrencies, resulting in significant financial consequences for the parties involved.

To mitigate these risks, it is essential for custodial platforms to have robust security protocols in place, including regular audits, proper key management procedures, and comprehensive insurance coverage. It is also advisable for users to diversify their holdings across multiple custodians to reduce the concentration of risk.

As the crypto industry continues to mature, regulatory frameworks and industry standards for custodial services are likely to evolve. Regulators and industry participants are actively working towards establishing guidelines and best practices to ensure the safe storage and management of digital assets.

In conclusion, the legal dispute between Celsius and StakeHound highlights the challenges and complexities surrounding the custody and exchange of cryptocurrencies. The outcome of this case will likely have broader implications for the crypto lending and custody space, underscoring the importance of secure custodial solutions in the industry. As the crypto industry continues to evolve, stakeholders must remain vigilant in assessing the security measures and reputation of custodial platforms to protect their digital assets effectively.

 

Read more about:
Share on

Sakamoto Nashi

Nashi Sakamoto, a dedicated crypto journalist from the Virgin Islands, brings expert analysis and insight into the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. Appreciate the work? Send a tip to: 0x4C6D67705aF449f0C0102D4C7C693ad4A64926e9

Crypto newsletter

Get the latest Crypto & Blockchain News in your inbox.

By clicking Subscribe, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Get the latest updates from our Telegram channel.

Telegram Icon Join Now ×