BNB $594.33 +3.86%
XRP $1.13 +4.32%
ETH $1,633.62 +5.01%
BTC $61,969.29 +2.20%
BNB $594.33 +3.86%
XRP $1.13 +4.32%
ETH $1,633.62 +5.01%
BTC $61,969.29 +2.20%
BREAKING
Altcoins News

CME and ICE Want Hyperliquid Regulated Out of 24/7 Oil Trading

CME and ICE Want Hyperliquid Regulated Out of 24/7 Oil Trading
CME and ICE Want Hyperliquid Regulated Out of 24/7 Oil Trading

Community Trust ScoreVerified

82%
Real
Verified33 votes
Updated 3 weeks ago

CME Group is moving to 24/7 crypto futures and options trading starting May 29. It’s a big step — and it comes with a political fight attached.

The Chicago-based exchange logged $3 trillion in notional crypto volume in 2025, up 46% year-to-date. That’s not a small number. And CME isn’t alone in chasing the clock. The New York Stock Exchange, run by ICE, is building a tokenized securities platform designed to trade around the clock — though that one still needs regulatory approval before it goes live. Both exchanges have spent heavily on continuous trading infrastructure, the kind of setup that crypto-native platforms basically invented and have run for years without much pushback.

Now CME and ICE want that pushback applied to someone else.

Advertisement

Lobbying Against Hyperliquid

The two exchange giants have been urging U.S. officials to take action against Hyperliquid, an offshore trading venue that lets users trade perpetual contracts — including one that tracks WTI crude oil prices — anonymously and without the compliance scaffolding that regulated U.S. exchanges must carry. CME and ICE argue that Hyperliquid’s model could distort global oil prices and make it easier for bad actors to manipulate markets. Their case to regulators is pretty much: this platform is a risk to the integrity of commodity markets, and someone needs to do something about it.

Hyperliquid’s WTI perpetual contract hit over $1.2 billion in 24-hour volume at one point. That’s real size. Not theoretical. That’s the kind of number that gets attention in Washington.

The platform runs on its own Layer 1 blockchain with a fully on-chain order book. Trades and liquidations settle with one-block finality. It supports pseudonymous trading and permissionless market creation — meaning basically anyone can spin up a perpetual market with customizable oracles and leverage limits, thanks to its HIP-3 framework. Fast, flexible, and largely outside the reach of U.S. regulators. That combination is exactly what CME and ICE are pointing at when they talk about systemic risk.

CFTC’s Role and Past Enforcement

The CFTC is the regulator at the center of all this. Its existing framework requires strict surveillance and monitoring — and it’s enforced that framework hard before. The $920.2 million penalty it hit JPMorgan with for spoofing is probably the clearest example of what the agency does when it thinks markets are being gamed. The CFTC has also examined suspicious oil trades on CME and ICE platforms directly, which makes its scrutiny of Hyperliquid’s commodity-linked products more than just theoretical.

But Hyperliquid’s decentralized structure makes enforcement genuinely murky. There’s no central entity to fine in the same clean way. No headquarters to raid. The anonymous trading model that CME and ICE are complaining about is also, structurally, the thing that makes it hard to regulate in the first place.

If regulators side with CME and ICE, Hyperliquid could face access restrictions or compliance requirements that would likely cut into its 30-day perpetual volume in a serious way. If regulators don’t see Hyperliquid’s setup as uniquely dangerous, the platform probably keeps growing. And it’s been growing fast.

What’s Actually at Stake

The competitive angle here can’t be ignored. CME and ICE are building 24/7 infrastructure right now. They’re spending real money on it. And Hyperliquid is already there, already doing volume, already pulling traders who want speed and anonymity over compliance and oversight. The lobbying push isn’t just about market integrity — it’s about who controls continuous trading when the legacy exchanges finally get there.

That tension between traditional financial institutions and crypto-native platforms isn’t new. It’s been building for years. But the oil market angle sharpens it. Commodity markets are politically sensitive. Oil prices affect everything. Regulators who might otherwise move slowly on crypto perps get a lot more motivated when the word “oil” enters the conversation.

Hyperliquid’s 30-day perpetual volume stays significant regardless of the lobbying noise for now. The CFTC hasn’t moved publicly. No formal action has been announced. And the NYSE’s tokenized securities platform still hasn’t cleared regulatory approval, which means ICE is fighting for rules it hasn’t fully built under yet either.

The $920.2 million JPMorgan penalty took years to land after the underlying conduct.

Frequently Asked Questions

When is CME launching 24/7 crypto futures trading?

CME Group plans to extend cryptocurrency futures and options trading to 24/7 operations starting May 29, following $3 trillion in notional volume in 2025.

Why are CME and ICE pushing against Hyperliquid specifically?

They claim Hyperliquid’s anonymous, offshore perpetual trading — including a WTI crude contract that hit over $1.2 billion in 24-hour volume — could distort oil prices and enable market manipulation without regulatory oversight.

Community Trust IndexHigh Confidence
82%
Real
Real82%18%Fake
33 community signals

Maheen Hernandez

A finance graduate, Maheen Hernandez has been drawn to cryptocurrencies ever since Bitcoin first gained mainstream attention. She covers the latest developments in blockchain technology, DeFi protocols, and regulatory frameworks for The Currency Analytics.

Advertisement

Related Stories