Community Trust ScoreVerified
In 2025, digital asset treasury companies (DATs) have become major players in the cryptocurrency market, investing over $42.7 billion in crypto acquisitions throughout the year. Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, has pointed out that the valuation of these firms is often misunderstood and should usually reflect a discount compared to the assets they hold. This observation is rooted in a complex framework that considers several factors influencing DATs’ market performance and future valuations.
Hougan emphasizes that the value of a DAT should be assessed by imagining the firm with a limited lifespan. If a Bitcoin-focused DAT were to announce an immediate liquidation, its market value would align perfectly with its bitcoin holdings, achieving a market-to-net asset value (mNAV) ratio of 1.0. However, if the liquidation were postponed for a year, various factors could cause deviations from this baseline value.
Three primary reasons account for the discounts often seen in DATs’ valuations: illiquidity, expenses, and risk. Illiquidity relates to the lesser value investors might assign to Bitcoin they are promised in the future, suggesting a potential 5-10% discount. Operational expenses are another critical factor. For instance, a DAT holding $100 in BTC per share but incurring $10 per share annually for executive salaries would result in a 10% discount. Lastly, risk—defined as possible operational mishaps or failures—further impacts the valuation of these companies.
On the flip side, DATs can justify trading at a premium if they consistently increase their crypto-per-share. In the United States, this remains the sole justification for a premium, according to Hougan. He describes four strategies that DATs might employ to achieve this: issuing USD-denominated debt for crypto purchases, lending crypto to earn interest, using derivatives like call options for additional income, and acquiring crypto at a discount.
Discounted acquisitions might involve buying locked assets from foundations needing liquidity, purchasing another DAT trading below its asset value, repurchasing their own shares at a discount, or investing in a business that generates cash flow which is subsequently allocated to crypto. However, Hougan underscores that achieving a premium is challenging due to the inherent uncertainty of these strategies compared to the more predictable discount factors.
In practice, DATs do not have predetermined expiration dates, but the model of valuation remains relevant over time. Expenses and risks tend to accumulate, whereas companies that consistently enhance their crypto-per-share could become significantly more valuable. Larger DATs enjoy structural advantages, like easier access to debt markets and more substantial crypto reserves for lending, which provide more opportunities for strategic mergers, acquisitions, or other discounted transactions.
Despite these advantages, the landscape remains competitive. Over the past six months, DATs have generally moved in unison, but Hougan anticipates increased differentiation among firms. Only a few will manage to perform well enough to justify a premium in their valuations, leaving many others trading at discounts.
In historical context, the cryptocurrency market has experienced rapid evolution. From its inception with Bitcoin in 2009, the market has expanded to include thousands of digital assets and a global capitalization reaching trillions of dollars at its peak. Such growth has drawn increased attention from institutional investors and regulatory bodies alike. However, it also presents risks such as volatility, regulatory changes, and technological obsolescence.
As an example of market activity, Bitcoin DAT companies have been particularly active in 2025, with acquisitions exceeding $30 billion, accounting for 70.3% of total purchases. Ethereum-focused DATs have followed, with $7.9 billion in acquisitions, predominantly in August. Other assets like SOL, BNB, and WLFI contributed to 11.2% of the year’s spending. In the third quarter alone, firms invested $22.6 billion, marking the strongest quarter for accumulation in recorded history.
A counterpoint to Hougan’s valuation model is the potential for regulatory changes which could disrupt current market dynamics. As governments around the world continue to develop and refine cryptocurrency regulations, unexpected shifts could significantly impact the operations and valuations of DATs. Moreover, technological advancements or failures could alter the playing field, introducing new risks or opportunities that current models fail to fully capture.
In summary, while DATs play a crucial role in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, their valuation is a nuanced issue shaped by illiquidity, expenses, risk, and potential growth in crypto-per-share. Hougan’s insights provide a framework for understanding why most DATs trade at a discount, emphasizing the complexities and challenges these firms face in striving for profitability and premium status. As the market continues to grow and evolve, DATs must navigate a landscape filled with both opportunities and uncertainties.
