The world’s largest asset management firm, BlackRock, has remained on the sidelines when it comes to filing for an XRP-backed exchange-traded fund (ETF), despite other asset managers such as Grayscale, Bitwise, and Canary Capital already stepping in. These firms have collectively filed for about 15 different XRP ETF products, both spot and leveraged, in an attempt to capitalize on the growing popularity of digital assets.

However, BlackRock has shown no inclination to join the rush, even though XRP has gained significant institutional interest in recent months. So, why is the firm holding back? Experts point to several factors, ranging from regulatory concerns to internal benchmarks, that explain BlackRock’s hesitation to file for an XRP ETF.

BlackRock’s Strong Presence in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs

One of the primary reasons BlackRock has stayed away from XRP ETFs is its current dominance in the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF markets. With its iShares Bitcoin Trust recently surpassing $30 billion in assets under management (AUM), and its Ethereum ETF crossing the $1 billion mark within just two months, BlackRock is enjoying a strong market position with minimal incentive to pivot to XRP, a relatively less established asset.

The firm is likely more focused on its existing ETF products, which have seen significant success, rather than venturing into an asset like XRP that lacks the same degree of market recognition and stability. The risk of taking on a less-trusted asset, especially with ongoing regulatory questions, could be seen as unnecessary.

Regulatory Uncertainty Around XRP

Another important factor contributing to BlackRock’s hesitation is the regulatory uncertainty surrounding XRP. The ongoing legal battle between Ripple, the company behind XRP, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues to cast a shadow over the asset. While both parties have agreed to drop their respective appeals, the lawsuit has not yet officially concluded.

For a conservative institution like BlackRock, which prioritizes risk management, the lingering regulatory ambiguity is a significant deterrent. Despite the potential for XRP to emerge from the lawsuit in a stronger position, the unresolved legal matters are likely keeping BlackRock from entering the market.

XRP’s classification by the SEC as a potential security still looms large, which makes it a riskier asset for investment firms to engage with. As the situation stands, many institutional investors prefer to wait for clearer regulatory guidance before making any major moves into the XRP market.

Internal Benchmarks and Market Liquidity

BlackRock typically adheres to strict internal benchmarks when evaluating assets for its ETFs. Experts suggest that XRP still falls short of some of these criteria, particularly in terms of liquidity, institutional demand, and legal clarity. Although XRP has made notable strides in each of these areas, it has not yet reached the threshold that BlackRock deems necessary for introducing an ETF product.

Liquidity is a key consideration for BlackRock, especially since the firm deals with substantial amounts of capital. Although XRP has gained traction, it still lags behind more established cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, both of which enjoy far greater liquidity in the market.

Additionally, institutional demand for XRP products remains a work in progress. While firms like Bitwise are reporting increased interest from clients, the demand for XRP ETFs is not yet strong enough to justify BlackRock’s involvement at this point.

Patience and Strategic Approach

Another reason for BlackRock’s hesitation is its tendency to take a patient and strategic approach to market moves. Rather than being first to file, BlackRock often prefers to let other players test the waters. This allows the firm to assess the market dynamics and observe how the SEC responds to filings from other firms like Grayscale and Franklin Templeton.

This measured approach enables BlackRock to ensure that it makes the right move when it finally decides to enter the XRP ETF space, if at all.

Moreover, BlackRock’s previous experience with a fake XRP ETF filing in November 2023 may have influenced its cautious stance. The incident, which falsely linked BlackRock to an XRP ETF, caused confusion and forced the firm to publicly clarify its position. This misstep may have contributed to the company’s reluctance to rush into the XRP market before it is fully prepared.

XRP’s Market Position and the Long Game

Despite XRP’s lower market cap compared to Bitcoin and Ethereum, the asset has made impressive gains recently, outperforming Ethereum by 262% since November. It is now only $74 billion away from overtaking Ethereum in market cap rankings. As XRP’s market position strengthens, BlackRock may be more inclined to reconsider its stance in the future.

However, experts believe BlackRock is likely playing the long game. By waiting for greater regulatory clarity and monitoring the success of XRP ETF products introduced by competitors, BlackRock can make a more informed decision when the time is right.

For now, BlackRock’s strategy seems to be one of patience, ensuring that when it does enter the XRP ETF space, it does so under the most favorable conditions, with all the necessary regulatory and market factors aligned.