Colin LeMahieu opined, “BTC costs too much to use, plain and simple. The only reason the revolution of decentralized money has stalled is because we get stuck on old tech.”

A critic, in turn, replied, “This campaign against BTC that Nano foundation and part of the community is pursuing recently is going to backfire and result toxic for the ecosystem.. I hope you realize that and stop.”

Nano backers came for the rescue, stating nothing will backfire or be toxic.  Further accepting that the only argument thrown at Nano is his price action.  Reinstating, we won’t stop either.

Colin also opined that the lowest cost tech would win.  He also stated that his dedication is to the concept of decentralized digital money.  He also went ahead, stating that he would have been into BTC, if he thought it would cross the finish line.

Yet another critic opined, you are too rigid in your thinking.  Clarified stating, if art were objective, most of it would be worthless.

Colin Further opined, “The list is updated every minute: All transactions are packaged into a so-called “block.” ‘ If you like one minute block times, wait until you try Nano.”

Someone who was impressed with nano explained his experience, “First of all, I like both Bitcoin and $NANO (for different reasons), but I have to say that I wanted to take some money off a well-known crypto wallet and the $BTC fee was £3.50, so I converted it to NANO and sent it for free. And it was instant. So impressed with @nano.”

Sydney Ifergan, the crypto expert, tweeted:  “Nano claims it is becoming very easy to access as it is to use. Convenience is good for users regardless of BTC or NANO. Users take to convenience.”

Nano Vs. BTC

Several Nano users approve of the fact that they do not move BTC/ETH exchange to exchange rather convert it to Nano and move smooth.

Supporters further stated if exchanges could use NANO for their liquidity and also to onboard and disperse funds, it would be a great use case for NANO. P2P case for NANO is second to none. SOV and security are something that’s imperative for Bitcoin base layer.

Critics are everywhere, and one of them stated Nano is semi-centralized.  A Nano enthusiast proposed his part of the story stating I love nano, but BTC is a lie.  He further opined that BTC is a distraction to trap people who are looking to escape from fiat.