Community Trust ScoreVerified
The long-running legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may finally be heading toward closure. After nearly four years of court proceedings, regulatory uncertainty, and community speculation, August 15 has emerged as a critical date. While many believe this could mark the end of the lawsuit that has clouded the future of XRP since 2020, new insights from a former SEC attorney suggest the finish line hasn’t been crossed just yet.
The XRP community has been closely watching every development in the Ripple vs SEC case, hoping for definitive signs that the legal struggle is finally winding down. In recent days, this anticipation reached a new peak when one Ripple supporter took to social media to directly ask Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse about the status of the company’s legal actions. The supporter specifically wanted to know whether Ripple had officially withdrawn its appeal against the SEC and questioned the role of Paul Atkins, a former SEC commissioner advising Ripple, in the final steps of the case.
Marc Fagel, a former SEC regional director with deep knowledge of securities law and court procedures, weighed in on the discussion. His response provided a detailed look at where things actually stand—and why both parties are still technically entangled in the legal process.
According to Fagel, neither Ripple nor the SEC has officially dropped their respective appeals yet. Contrary to some assumptions within the XRP community, the process of withdrawing an appeal isn’t automatic or informal. Instead, it involves internal approvals and public court filings. The SEC, being a regulatory agency, must first conduct an internal vote to determine whether it will proceed with dismissing its appeal. Only after that vote can the agency file the necessary documents in court to make its decision official.
Following the SEC’s move, Ripple would then submit its own paperwork to withdraw its counter-appeal. These filings would be made on the public court docket, where they can be viewed by anyone tracking the case. Only after both sets of filings are completed and approved by the court can the case be officially considered closed.
Fagel’s comments also addressed another topic that has generated confusion within the crypto community: the $125 million penalty Ripple agreed to pay as part of the settlement. Some users speculated that Ripple might use XRP tokens to pay the fine instead of cash, possibly as a way to reinforce confidence in its native asset. However, Fagel clarified that such a move would be legally complex and unlikely at this stage of the case.
He explained that the penalty has already been paid in cash and is being held in escrow until the appeal process is completed. Once all legal motions are finalized, the funds will be transferred to the U.S. Treasury. According to Fagel, any attempt to modify the payment method would require a new court order—an unnecessary step given how close the case is to wrapping up.
This update comes at a time when the XRP community is looking for closure and clarity. XRP’s price and market confidence have long been affected by the legal battle, which began in December 2020 when the SEC accused Ripple of conducting an unregistered securities offering. Although Ripple scored partial legal victories in the past year—especially when a judge ruled that XRP is not a security when sold to the public—uncertainty around appeals has continued to weigh on investor sentiment.
What happens next is largely procedural, but still important. Once the SEC completes its internal vote and files its dismissal, Ripple is expected to do the same. The court would then process these requests, officially marking the end of a landmark case that has shaped how crypto assets are treated under U.S. securities law.
Interestingly, the SEC is not required to make a public statement when dropping its appeal. Instead, observers will have to rely on official court filings to confirm the agency’s decisions. These filings are typically posted on the court docket, which is accessible to the public and frequently monitored by crypto legal analysts and news outlets.
As August 15 approaches, the crypto world remains cautiously optimistic. The outcome of this case could set important precedents for how other crypto projects approach regulatory compliance in the U.S. If Ripple and the SEC finally put their appeals to rest, it could signal a major shift in how crypto regulation is enforced—one that may benefit not just Ripple, but the broader blockchain industry.
For now, all eyes are on the court docket and any signs of formal filings. While many in the XRP community are hoping for a dramatic announcement, the resolution to one of crypto’s most closely watched legal battles may arrive quietly, sealed in a few lines of legal text that bring years of tension to a close.
