Home Bitcoin News SEC Divided Over Bitcoin ETF Approval: What it Means for Cryptocurrency Investors

SEC Divided Over Bitcoin ETF Approval: What it Means for Cryptocurrency Investors

In a noteworthy development within the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a split decision has emerged regarding the approval of the first-ever Bitcoin spot Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF). The decision has exposed a clear division among SEC commissioners, raising questions about the fate of other cryptocurrencies seeking ETF approval.

The approval of the Bitcoin spot ETF saw affirmative votes from three out of five SEC commissioners – Hester Peirce, Mark Uyeda, and Chairman Gary Gensler. On the opposing side, Commissioners Caroline Crenshaw and Jaime Lizárraga voted against the approval, highlighting a lack of unanimity within the regulatory body.

This voting divide has prompted legal experts to speculate on the potential impact on other cryptocurrency ETFs, particularly focusing on XRP. Bill Morgan, a well-known pro-XRP legal expert, emphasized the significance of obtaining Gary Gensler’s approval for an ETF tied to Ethereum or XRP. Morgan asserted, “You need a vote from Gary Gensler to approve a spot Ethereum or XRP ETF. Let that sink in.”

Commissioners Peirce and Uyeda, who supported the approval of the Bitcoin spot ETF, have gained recognition for their resistance to the SEC’s negative measures against cryptocurrencies. Notably, they opposed the SEC’s decision to deny Coinbase’s petition for rulemaking in the previous year, showcasing a more favorable stance toward crypto innovations.

In contrast, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler, despite voting in favor of the Bitcoin spot ETF, has a reputation for expressing less-than-favorable views on cryptocurrencies. Bill Morgan underscored the crucial role of Gensler’s approval in determining the destiny of any crypto ETF under the current SEC leadership. The legal expert argued that confidence in swift approval of an Ethereum or XRP spot ETF is misplaced, given Gensler’s unyielding position.

Gensler himself acknowledged the challenges and legal defeats the SEC faced, stating, “The U.S. Court of Appeals held that the Commission failed to adequately explain its reasoning in disapproving the listing and trading of Grayscale’s proposed ETP.” He further explained that, based on these circumstances, he felt approving the listing and trading of Bitcoin spot ETF shares was the most sustainable path forward.

Bill Morgan’s cautionary words find support in Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart’s assertions. Seyffart suggested that obtaining approval for an XRP ETF might require a new SEC chairman, adding another layer of complexity to the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrency ETFs.

In essence, the recent SEC decision on the Bitcoin spot ETF highlights the challenges and uncertainties surrounding cryptocurrency regulations. Investors and enthusiasts are closely watching these developments as they unfold, recognizing the significant influence that regulatory decisions can have on the broader cryptocurrency market.

Commissioners Hester Peirce, Mark Uyeda, and Chairman Gary Gensler voted in favor of the Bitcoin spot ETF, while Commissioners Caroline Crenshaw and Jaime Lizárraga opposed the approval. This split decision has sparked discussions about the implications for other cryptocurrency ETFs, particularly XRP.

Legal expert Bill Morgan, known for his pro-XRP stance, emphasized the significance of Gary Gensler’s vote in shaping the destiny of an XRP ETF. Morgan stated, “You need a vote from Gary Gensler to approve a spot Ethereum or XRP ETF. Let that sink in.” This remark underscores the pivotal role Gensler plays in determining the fate of crypto ETFs under the current SEC leadership.

Commissioners Peirce and Uyeda, who supported the approval of the Bitcoin spot ETF, have gained recognition for their resistance to the SEC’s negative measures against cryptocurrencies. Notably, they opposed the SEC’s decision to deny Coinbase’s petition for rulemaking in December. On the other hand, Gensler, the SEC chairman, has a less favorable stance on cryptocurrencies, making his vote crucial for the approval of any crypto ETF.

As the crypto community navigates these regulatory waters, the future of cryptocurrency ETFs remains uncertain. The dynamics within the SEC leadership, as evidenced by the split vote, underscore the importance of regulatory clarity and a unified approach to ensure a fair and transparent playing field for all stakeholders.

Read more about:
Share on

James

James T, a passionate crypto journalist from South Africa, explores Litecoin, Dash, & Bitcoin intricacies. Loves sharing insights. Enjoy his work? Donate to support! Dash: XrD3ZdZAebm988BfHr1vqZZu6amSGuKR5F

Rate this article 0 / 5. 0

Crypto newsletter

Get the latest Crypto & Blockchain News in your inbox.

By clicking Subscribe, you agree to our Privacy Policy.