Community Trust ScoreVerified
Hyperliquid’s native token just posted an 80% gain over the past three months. Bitcoin managed 10% in that same stretch. Pretty wild when you look at what’s happening underneath.
The numbers tell a weird story. Crypto analyst Michael Nadeau points out the market’s paying more for each dollar of revenue the platform brings in. The fully diluted price-to-sales ratio hit 47.3, up 67% from last quarter. That’s backwards from how things usually work—valuations typically shrink when fundamentals get shaky, not expand. And the fundamentals? They’re getting shaky.
Hyperliquid’s perpetual decentralized exchange pulled in $153.8 million in fees over the last 90 days. That’s down 13% from the previous quarter, though it’s still up 12.3% year-over-year. Nearly all those fees—99% of them—went straight into HYPE buybacks. Average daily trading volume climbed 6% quarter-over-quarter to $7.07 billion. But open interest? That fell hard, dropping to $7.6 billion. That’s a 51% decline from the peak.
Market Share Dominance Masks Broader Weakness
Hyperliquid leads the pack among decentralized perpetual exchanges with 72% market share. Sounds impressive until you zoom out. When you include centralized platforms, the protocol only captures about 5% of total volume. The big players still dominate this space.
Capital flows paint an even messier picture. Right now, $3.36 billion sits bridged into Hyperliquid. That’s down 44% from the peak. Over the past 90 days, $730 million left the network. Half a billion of that—$500 million—walked out the door since early April alone. People are pulling money out, and fast.
Active addresses did tick up 6.6% quarter-over-quarter, averaging 46,000 per day. So there’s some user growth happening. The question is whether it’s enough to offset the capital flight.
HIP-3 Framework Explodes While HyperEVM Stumbles
Not everything’s declining. The HIP-3 framework, which lets third parties launch their own perpetual DEXs on top of Hyperliquid’s infrastructure, saw volumes jump 973% quarter-over-quarter. Daily volumes hit $2.58 billion, accounting for 36% of total activity. That’s a huge win for the ecosystem approach.
But the HyperEVM side tells a different story. Revenue there dropped 33% quarter-over-quarter to $1.84 million. Active addresses fell too. The ecosystem’s split between winners and losers right now.
Stablecoin supply on HyperEVM did climb to $1.83 billion, mostly because of USDC inflows. That’s one bright spot in an otherwise murky segment. When stablecoins flow in, it usually means people are getting ready to trade or deploy capital. Whether they actually do that remains unclear.
Token dynamics show buybacks outpacing new issuance over the past 90 days. That creates net deflation for HYPE, which theoretically supports price. The buyback yield dropped to 2.55% on a fully diluted basis, though. And core contributor token unlocks will keep happening through 2027, adding supply pressure down the road.
The valuation versus fundamentals gap keeps widening. HYPE’s price is climbing way faster than the platform’s actual usage and revenue. That kind of disconnect doesn’t last forever. Either fundamentals catch up, or the price comes back down to earth.
Some segments are expanding while others contract. The HIP-3 volumes surging 973% show real developer interest in building on Hyperliquid’s infrastructure. Third-party perpetual DEXs now represent more than a third of total trading volume. That’s meaningful adoption of the platform’s core technology.
The capital outflows are harder to ignore. When $730 million leaves in 90 days, with $500 million of that in just a few weeks, something’s spooked holders. Maybe it’s profit-taking after the token’s run. Maybe it’s concerns about sustainability. The data doesn’t say.
Open interest falling 51% from peak levels signals traders are closing positions or moving elsewhere. That’s a red flag for any derivatives platform. Volume can stay high even as open interest shrinks, but it usually means shorter-term trading rather than conviction bets.
Hyperliquid’s 72% share of the decentralized perpetual market looks dominant until you remember centralized exchanges still handle the vast majority of derivatives trading. Breaking into that remaining 95% of the market will be tough. Centralized platforms offer deeper liquidity, faster execution, and more trading pairs. Decentralized alternatives have to compete on other factors—transparency, self-custody, censorship resistance.
The HyperEVM revenue drop of 33% quarter-over-quarter raises questions about that ecosystem’s viability. When revenue falls while stablecoin supply rises, it suggests people are parking capital there but not actively using the platform. That’s not sustainable long-term.
Buybacks exceeding issuance creates short-term price support. But with the buyback yield at 2.55% on a fully diluted basis, the deflationary pressure isn’t massive. Token unlocks continuing through 2027 will add consistent selling pressure as contributors and early backers cash out.
The price-to-sales ratio jumping 67% in a quarter while revenue falls 13% is the core tension here. Markets are betting on future growth that hasn’t materialized yet. That bet could pay off if Hyperliquid cracks into centralized exchange market share or if HIP-3 adoption accelerates. But right now, the token’s running ahead of reality.
Active addresses growing 6.6% quarter-over-quarter shows some user base expansion. That’s a positive signal buried in otherwise mixed data. New users coming in while capital flows out creates an interesting dynamic. Smaller traders arriving as whales exit, maybe.
The $3.36 billion still bridged into Hyperliquid represents real capital committed to the ecosystem. That’s not nothing. But the 44% drop from peak levels and recent acceleration of outflows suggests confidence is eroding. The platform needs to stabilize those flows before they become a bigger problem.
Hub: Bitcoin price, news, and analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
How much has HYPE token gained recently compared to Bitcoin?
HYPE surged 80% over the past 90 days while Bitcoin gained only 10% during the same period, showing significantly stronger price performance despite mixed fundamentals.
What’s happening with capital flows on Hyperliquid?
Currently $3.36 billion is bridged into Hyperliquid, down 44% from peak levels, with $730 million exiting in the past 90 days and $500 million of that leaving since early April.
