Despite the common aspiration among crypto projects to get listed on Binance, the Pi Network community is increasingly expressing the view that not being listed on the world’s largest crypto exchange may actually be advantageous. This perspective stems from observations of how newly listed tokens on Binance often experience volatile price swings—massive spikes followed by severe crashes—that can undermine a project’s long-term stability and community trust.

A growing number of Pi Network users have pointed out that tokens listed on Binance tend to suffer sharp declines shortly after their debut, sometimes losing 90 to 95 percent of their value within a brief period. This pattern, often driven by short-term traders and automated bots rushing to capitalize on the initial hype, frequently results in a sell-off that damages both the token’s price and reputation. Pi enthusiasts argue that the absence of a Binance listing has shielded their token from such volatile, exploitative behavior. This protection has allowed Pi to grow organically, with a focus on community-building and ecosystem development rather than speculative price movements.

Earlier this year, a Pi Network news account on X (formerly Twitter) conducted a poll asking whether Pi should pursue a Binance listing. The results showed a surprising resistance from the community, with many users prioritizing the resolution of foundational issues—such as Know Your Customer (KYC) verification bugs—over the allure of a high-profile exchange listing. The consensus was that fixing these critical technical and user-experience challenges should come before any exchange listing could be seriously considered.

Reddit discussions reflect similar sentiments. Some community members emphasize that Pi’s value proposition extends far beyond its presence on any exchange. While acknowledging that a Binance listing could increase Pi’s visibility and attract new investors, they caution that the project’s long-term success depends more on its core team’s ability to deliver on promises, improve public relations, update the user interface, and communicate effectively with the community. For many, the strength of Pi lies in its vast user base and the ecosystem it is gradually building rather than in the hype generated by exchange listings.

Pioneers within the Pi Network often stress that the community and ecosystem are the real assets of the project. The token’s value, they say, emerges from active participation, ongoing development, and real-world utility—not from the transient price surges driven by speculative trading. This focus on sustainable growth reflects a desire to avoid the pitfalls seen in other projects that chase exchange listings at the expense of foundational development.

However, not all analysts share this optimistic view. Dr Altcoin, a well-known crypto analyst, has suggested that Pi’s struggles with maintaining its value—currently hovering below $1.30 and falling in market rankings—are closely connected to the project’s failure to secure a Binance listing, despite apparent community support. He cites a lack of major statements on key dates like Pi Day as contributing factors to waning investor confidence. To restore enthusiasm and trust, Dr Altcoin argues, the Pi Core Team needs to present a clear roadmap and secure listings on major exchanges, starting with Binance.

Pi Coin is already listed on several exchanges, including OKX, Bitget, Gate.io, and MEXC. These listings provide some trading access and liquidity for users but have not yet delivered the significant boost a Binance listing might offer. The upcoming Pi2Day event, scheduled for June 28, has generated considerable excitement within the community. Many hope the event will bring major statements, possibly including confirmation of a Binance listing or other strategic developments to strengthen the project’s market position.

Earlier in 2025, Binance hinted at Pi through a tweet, which fueled waves of excitement and speculation about a potential listing. This teasing has kept expectations high, even as the Core Team has remained largely quiet on the issue. The community is eager for transparency and concrete plans that will help transform Pi from a promising project into a formidable player in the blockchain space.

Ultimately, the debate within the Pi Network community about Binance highlights a broader tension faced by many crypto projects: the trade-off between rapid exposure and the risks of market volatility versus steady, controlled growth centered on solid fundamentals and community trust. While some see Binance as the gateway to mass adoption and legitimacy, others view it as a double-edged sword that could expose the project to unnecessary instability.

For Pi Network, the path forward likely involves a balance between continuing to enhance the platform’s technical robustness, expanding its ecosystem, and pursuing strategic listings in a way that aligns with the community’s long-term vision. Whether or not Binance becomes part of that strategy, the project’s ultimate success will depend on its ability to maintain user confidence and deliver meaningful innovation in the competitive crypto landscape.