Ripple has just encountered another roadblock in its prolonged legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). On June 26, Judge Analisa Torres of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected a key request from both Ripple and the SEC, denying a motion for an indicative ruling. The decision effectively upholds a previous penalty of $125 million against the San Francisco-based blockchain firm and maintains a longstanding injunction.
This decision represents a critical development in a case that has gripped the crypto industry for years, especially as Ripple continues to fight for clarity over XRP’s legal status in the U.S.
The denied motion sought two things: to reduce Ripple’s $125 million monetary penalty and to dissolve a permanent injunction imposed in 2024. Both Ripple and the SEC had jointly submitted the motion, hoping to alter terms of the final judgment.
However, Judge Torres wasn’t convinced. The ruling means the penalty and restrictions issued in 2024 will remain in full effect. At the time, the court found that Ripple had violated Section 5 of the Securities Act by selling XRP to institutional investors without proper registration.
Legal experts had pointed to this motion as a potential turning point in Ripple’s favor, one that could ease its financial and operational pressures. With the denial, the company now faces renewed uncertainty as it seeks to expand globally while remaining constrained in one of its most important markets.
The SEC filed its lawsuit against Ripple in December 2020, alleging that XRP was sold as an unregistered security. Ripple has consistently argued that XRP should be treated like a commodity and not subject to the same regulatory scrutiny as stocks or bonds.
After years of legal proceedings, Judge Torres issued a partial ruling in 2023 that delivered mixed results. While the court found that Ripple’s retail sales of XRP through exchanges did not qualify as securities transactions, it ruled that XRP sales to institutional investors did breach securities laws. That ruling became the basis for the final judgment in August 2024, which imposed the $125 million fine and a permanent injunction against Ripple.
This recent motion was seen as a last-ditch effort by both parties to resolve parts of the case more favorably. The rejection signals that the court is not ready to revisit its prior decisions without substantial justification.
Ripple now finds itself boxed into a more difficult legal and financial position. The $125 million fine stands, and the injunction continues to restrict the company’s XRP-related activities with institutional clients in the U.S.
The denial also dampens hopes for a fast resolution to the broader legal standoff. While Ripple remains operational and continues to expand internationally, the unresolved legal challenges in the U.S. continue to cloud its future.
XRP, Ripple’s native token, reacted to the news with a modest price drop. Within 24 hours of the ruling, XRP declined by 1.6%, indicating some investor concern but not widespread panic.
This reaction may reflect the community’s growing resilience amid years of courtroom drama, though the long-term impact of the court’s decision is still unfolding.
Several legal commentators previously said this motion could be a pivotal step toward ending the case. By collaborating with the SEC to modify the judgment, Ripple had hoped to demonstrate cooperation and mitigate the ongoing penalties.
The court’s refusal to entertain that collaboration now reaffirms that the original judgment stands on solid legal ground. Analysts believe that Ripple’s next move could involve further appeals or strategic shifts in its U.S. operations to comply with the court’s orders.
“It’s a serious blow,” said one securities law analyst. “Even with the SEC’s participation in the motion, the judge clearly felt the previous decision should remain untouched.”
Despite the legal defeat, Ripple continues to pursue growth in global markets. The company recently made moves in Asia, Europe, and the Middle East, focusing on payment solutions that don’t rely on the U.S. market. It also introduced its own stablecoin, RLUSD, as part of its broader product offerings.
However, the ongoing legal entanglement with the SEC continues to limit its ability to operate freely within the United States. Until full legal clarity is achieved, Ripple’s operations will likely remain split between compliant international expansion and cautious domestic engagement.
Judge Torres’ decision to deny Ripple and the SEC’s joint motion marks a major moment in a legal battle that has defined regulatory debates in the crypto industry. For Ripple, it’s a frustrating turn in a case that has dragged on for more than four years. For the broader crypto world, the ruling reinforces how slowly U.S. courts move when it comes to defining the legal status of digital assets.
With no end in sight and legal momentum stalling, Ripple must now regroup and decide how to move forward—both in court and in the market.
Steven is an explorer by heart – both in the physical and the digital realm. A traveler, Steven continues to visit new places throughout the year in the physical world, while in the digital realm has been instrumental in a number of Kickstarter projects. Technology attracts Steven and through his business acumen has gained financial profits as well as fame in his business niche. Send a tip to: 0x200294f120Cd883DE8f565a5D0C9a1EE4FB1b4E9
Get the latest Crypto & Blockchain News in your inbox.
Join Now