The ongoing legal battle between Ripple Labs and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been a focal point of the cryptocurrency world for several years. Recently, the case has entered critical stages as both parties work toward finalizing a settlement agreement. Legal expert Bill Morgan has provided detailed insight into the procedural milestones and current status of this high-profile case. While the lawsuit began smoothly, recent developments have introduced hurdles that may influence the timeline and outcome.
The settlement process between Ripple and the SEC formally began gaining momentum in April 2025 when the parties jointly requested the Second Circuit Court to pause their appeals for 60 days. This freeze was designed to allow the two sides to negotiate a resolution without the pressures of ongoing litigation. On April 16, 2025, the Second Circuit granted this request and ordered the SEC to file a status report by June 16, 2025, marking the first formal step in the settlement timeline.
Shortly after, Ripple signed the settlement framework on April 23, 2025. The agreement was subsequently authorized by the SEC on May 8, 2025, following internal deliberations. The core terms of this settlement include reducing the original $125 million fine imposed on Ripple to $50 million and dismissing the permanent injunction that restricted Ripple’s ability to engage in future institutional sales. These terms represent significant concessions by the SEC and potential relief for Ripple, which has fought the case since late 2020.
Following the authorization, the parties jointly filed a motion for an indicative ruling on May 8, 2025. The purpose of this motion was to ask Judge Analisa Torres to dismiss the injunction and approve the lowered fine amount. However, this initial request hit a procedural snag when Judge Torres denied the motion a week later, on May 15, citing a procedural flaw and the failure of the parties to demonstrate “exceptional circumstances” as required under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This rejection stalled the settlement progress and indicated that the case would need to overcome additional legal hurdles.
In response to the setback, Ripple and the SEC promptly refiled the motion for an indicative ruling on June 12, 2025. This second filing addressed the procedural issues raised by Judge Torres and emphasized the exceptional circumstances that justify the court’s approval of the settlement. Alongside this development, the SEC informed the Second Circuit Court on June 16 about the ongoing status of the settlement negotiations, specifically noting that the second motion for an indicative ruling was pending in the district court. The SEC also requested an extension of the temporary pause on appeals by another 60 days, setting a new deadline for a status update to be submitted by August 15, 2025.
Despite these ongoing motions, the ultimate fate of the settlement remains in the hands of Judge Torres. Experts in the field, including attorney Fred Rispoli of Hodl Law, believe the chances of the motion being granted are favorable. Should Judge Torres approve the indicative ruling, the next procedural step would involve the parties submitting a motion to the Second Circuit Court seeking a limited remand. This remand would allow the district court to formally reduce the penalty to $50 million and remove the permanent injunction against Ripple’s institutional sales.
If the Second Circuit agrees to the limited remand, the case will be sent back to Judge Torres for final authorization of these relief measures. Only after this step could Ripple and the SEC move to request dismissal of their respective appeal and cross-appeal with the Second Circuit, effectively bringing the lawsuit to a close. Bill Morgan highlights that this sequence of events hinges on the favorable ruling of the second motion for indicative ruling. If the motion were to be denied again, it could prolong the litigation or lead to additional complications.
The Ripple-SEC settlement is significant not just for the company and the SEC, but for the entire cryptocurrency sector. The lawsuit’s resolution will likely set precedents regarding the classification of digital assets and the regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies in the United States. Ripple has long argued that XRP should not be classified as a security, and a settlement involving reduced penalties and lifted restrictions could affirm this position, potentially opening the door for greater adoption and institutional use of XRP.
Meanwhile, investors and industry observers continue to monitor the case closely, as its outcome will influence market sentiment and regulatory clarity. The settlement’s success would remove a major source of uncertainty for Ripple, potentially allowing XRP to regain momentum and attract new investment. However, as the case stands, several legal steps remain, and the ultimate resolution still depends on judicial decisions in the coming months.
In summary, the Ripple-SEC settlement is progressing through a complex legal process marked by key milestones such as the initial appeal freeze, the signing and authorization of the settlement framework, and motions for indicative rulings. The recent denial of the first motion introduced delays, but the refiling and ongoing negotiations suggest that both parties remain committed to reaching an agreement. If Judge Torres grants the pending motion, a limited remand will allow for the formal approval of reduced penalties and injunction dismissals. This will pave the way for the final dismissal of appeals, bringing this long-standing case closer to resolution and providing much-needed clarity for Ripple and the broader crypto ecosystem.
Get the latest Crypto & Blockchain News in your inbox.