U.S. Senate Candidate States CBDCs are Bad for People

Dennis Porter shared: BREAKING: U.S. Senate Candidate JoshMandelOhio declares that CBDCs are “bad for people, bad for humans, and bad for individuals.”

Community Response:

CBDC fun fact: You can only spend on what THEY allow you to spend on! Don’t give up stay decentralized! The world will change very fast and the change will be drastic.

C’mon, let’s be REAL, 1. If we stay with cash it will be bad for the environment that is why CBDC is coming along to replace that. 2. BTC cannot replace cash why? Because it is finite, BTC is an asset that will replace gold 3. Nobody uses cash anymore anyways.

Cryptocurrencies are an environmental disaster, the energy and resource demands of the blockchain are freaking insane.

And everyone seems to agree with that thankfully. I’m pretty bullish on the fact that the industry will continue to find the best way(s) forward on this. Almost everyone with a block/crypto project is working on it. Gotta give it its due time though.

Is he though? You might want to check out his other positions. Even if you agree with him on bitcoin, it might be more of a broken clock situation.

The broken clock is still right twice a day, and it looks like this is one of those times.

Immediately following Josh as he is an intelligent person.

He’s a trump fellating racist grifter.

I don’t think CDBC going to work, especially in other countries. No country will trust another country to monitor/track its funds. The US won’t use Digital Yuan, China won’t use digital USD and so other countries. This is why BTC work, decentralized, trustless.

And he is correct.

oshMandelOhio | don’t forget to point out CBDCs are also unconstitutional | same is true for all debasing currencies as monetary debasement = economic slavery.

As I am sure that many of his voter bases are invested in cryptocurrencies overall. The stalling of innovation is allowing our country to fall is all I am saying. We always knew that CBDCs are a dual-edge.

Isn’t the current fiat currency all digitally created by the central bank anyways? I think this CBDC is nothing but a play on words to create a new currency system based on a digital asset known as Bitcoin.

He is pro-bitcoin but not pro-bitcoin ideology. He believes in a centralized religion as the bedrock of the USA.

Next time I am asked where I live I will reply: “In a house, a building, and a brick structure.” Will that make me sound smart?

Hmmm, it’s easier to move “paper” money around physically and between bank accounts than it would be a public ledger CBDC.

Snowden feels the same way, I kinda get where he’s coming from on several points like privacy issues and central control.

That’s absurd. It’s the regulation and the laws surrounding them you have to be wary of. You have to keep American privacy sacred. Things like that you concern yourself with. You don’t just say Digital money is bad for you, by default. We mostly only use digital money.

Remember these are rich people trying to cling to their power….they want to control everything and don’t want us to be rich with them…

Is it really “Breaking News” when a candidate for something says something? Not exactly a policy vote.

Has the CDC begun classifying humans into these three groups? Is it in the coming issue of Scientific American?

The irony is that Josh would be so much more tolerable if he took some CBD gummies.

Most likely they are. Because they contain tools to spy, control, and bully. Politicians won’t resist using their tools!