In the fast-paced world of cryptocurrencies, the XRP community finds itself embroiled in a spirited discussion about the role of XRP holders in the XRP Ledger’s governance. This debate has been ignited by concerns surrounding the approval of the Automated Market Maker (AMM) feature on the XRPL. Let’s delve into this intriguing conversation.
Prominent XRP enthusiast WrathofKahneman (WOK) recently made a thought-provoking statement, stressing that XRP proponents should not be considered investors in the XRP Ledger solely by virtue of holding XRP tokens. This pronouncement comes amidst growing apprehensions about what some perceive as a delay in green-lighting the proposed AMM feature on the XRPL.
WOK’s reality check is grounded in the idea that holding XRP tokens doesn’t automatically confer formal investor status in the XRPL. According to WOK, being an XRP holder merely means that you have invested in a token traded on cryptocurrency exchanges. He firmly asserted that there is no formal relationship between the value of the XRP token and the infrastructure of the XRP Ledger. He argued that any attempt to tether XRP’s value to the XRP Ledger could inadvertently classify XRP as a security, a notion that is opposed by all XRP holders.
This statement by WOK has ignited a mixed bag of reactions within the XRP community. On-chain researcher Anderson concurred with WOK’s perspective, drawing attention to the potential consequences. Anderson highlighted that such a view could lead the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to categorize Proof of Stake (PoS) coins as securities, a scenario that many cryptocurrency enthusiasts would want to avoid.
WOK acknowledged this possibility, citing earlier sentiments expressed by SEC Chair Gensler. He also hinted that Ethereum (ETH) might come under similar scrutiny.
Within the XRP community, one member emphasized the vital liquidity that XRP holders provide to the XRPL, underscoring the importance of their voices being heard. WOK expressed empathy for this sentiment, acknowledging the contribution of XRP holders to liquidity. However, he reiterated that no formal agreement grants them governance or influence over the XRPL.
In response to another community member, WOK emphasized that, according to XRPL documentation, XRP is an issued asset, not a coin. He made it abundantly clear that the XRPL does not operate as a PoS network, where holding tokens equates to governance over the network.
The XRP Ledger (XRPL) AMM: A Background
The crux of this discourse lies in the growing concern among some XRP community members who feel that XRPL validators are unduly delaying a decision on approving the upcoming Automated Market Maker (AMM) feature, which is currently up for voting.
These delays have stirred a segment of the XRP community to assert their right to influence XRPL’s governance, citing their status as XRP investors. WOK’s comments effectively challenge this notion, sparking a profound dialogue about the essence of investor status in the cryptocurrency world.
As this conversation unfolds, it becomes increasingly evident that the XRP community’s passion for the XRPL’s development and governance is fervent. However, this passion is intertwined with a complex web of ideas, beliefs, and concerns about what it means to be an investor in this ever-evolving digital landscape.
While the XRPL debates and the fate of the AMM feature continue to captivate XRP enthusiasts, the overarching question remains: What defines an investor in the world of cryptocurrency, and how does one’s status impact the governance of a blockchain? These questions will likely play a pivotal role in shaping the future of the XRP community and the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.
Get the latest Crypto & Blockchain News in your inbox.