Community Trust ScoreVerified
Foundry USA wants its miners on board. The major U.S.-based mining pool has reached out directly to its customers, asking them to signal support for BIP-110, a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal that would cut the amount of data allowed inside a single Bitcoin transaction.
It’s a pretty significant ask. Foundry USA is one of the largest mining pools operating today, and when a pool that size starts coordinating miner signaling around a specific proposal, the rest of the industry pays attention. BIP-110 has been circulating inside the Bitcoin developer community for a while now, but the active push from a major pool moves it from theoretical discussion into something more concrete. The proposal’s core idea is straightforward: shrink the data that can be packed into a Bitcoin transaction. Smaller data per transaction could mean a more efficient network overall, and potentially lower fees for users. That last part matters a lot — Bitcoin transaction fees have been a recurring pain point, and any proposal that credibly promises relief tends to attract both supporters and skeptics fast.
Not everyone’s on board. The proposal has sparked real debate across the crypto community, and that’s not surprising — changes to Bitcoin’s transaction protocol touch a lot of interests at once. Miners, developers, exchanges, and everyday users all have skin in the game, and they don’t always want the same things.
Why Miner Signaling Actually Matters Here
Bitcoin doesn’t change easily. That’s kind of the point. Any significant protocol update needs broad consensus, and miner signaling is one of the clearest ways the network gauges whether that consensus exists. When miners signal support for a proposal, they’re basically casting a vote with their hashrate — and hashrate is real economic weight.
Foundry USA clearly understands the math. By reaching out to its client base and asking for coordinated signaling, the pool is trying to build momentum early. If enough miners follow through, BIP-110 gets closer to the threshold needed for serious consideration. If they don’t, the proposal stalls — probably for a long time. Bitcoin’s history is full of proposals that died not from bad ideas, but from insufficient miner coordination.
So Foundry USA’s move is partly technical advocacy and partly political organizing. The pool wants to shape the outcome, and contacting clients directly is the most direct lever it has.
What BIP-110 Would Actually Change
Strip away the jargon and BIP-110 is about one thing: how much data fits in a transaction. Right now, Bitcoin transactions can carry a certain amount of non-payment data — scripts, metadata, that kind of thing. BIP-110 would put tighter limits on that. The argument from supporters is that bloated transactions slow down the network and push fees higher. Leaner transactions, the thinking goes, mean faster processing and a cheaper experience for regular users.
But it’s not that simple. Critics of data-limiting proposals often argue that restricting what can live inside a transaction cuts off use cases that matter — things built on top of Bitcoin’s base layer that depend on that flexibility. And there’s a philosophical dimension too. Bitcoin’s developer culture tends to be conservative about changes, and anything that restricts functionality, even in the name of efficiency, gets scrutinized hard.
No official comment has come from any major industry player beyond Foundry USA’s outreach to its own clients. No final decision date has been set. Unclear whether other large pools are preparing similar calls to action, or whether they’re watching to see how Foundry USA’s push lands first.
The proposal’s fate is basically contingent on what miners do next. If Foundry USA’s clients signal support in meaningful numbers, that creates pressure on other pools to take a position. If the response is lukewarm, BIP-110 probably stays in the discussion phase for the foreseeable future.
It’s worth noting that miner consensus alone doesn’t guarantee implementation — Bitcoin’s development process involves multiple stakeholder groups, and developers and node operators carry real weight too. But miner signaling is often the first domino. Without it, proposals rarely move forward at all.
Foundry USA didn’t specify a timeline for how long it expects the signaling campaign to run, and no details have emerged about which other mining entities might coordinate alongside it. For now, the ball is pretty much in the hands of the miners themselves.
The broader Bitcoin community is watching. Fee pressure hasn’t gone away, efficiency debates haven’t cooled down, and BIP-110 sits right at the intersection of both. Foundry USA’s client list is large enough that their response will be a real signal — not just noise.
No endorsements from other major pools confirmed yet.
Hub: Bitcoin price, news, and analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
What is BIP-110 and what would it change about Bitcoin?
BIP-110 is a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal that would reduce the amount of data allowed inside a single Bitcoin transaction, with the goal of improving network efficiency and potentially lowering transaction fees.
Why did Foundry USA contact its mining clients about BIP-110?
Foundry USA reached out to its customers to ask them to signal support for BIP-110, hoping to build the miner consensus needed for the proposal to advance toward implementation.
