Community Trust ScoreVerified
The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority wants to save asset managers £128 million a year. It’s a big number, and the regulator is betting that streamlined reporting rules and a more flexible compliance framework can actually get there.
The core of the plan sits with something called FRAME — Fund Reporting for Asset Management Entities. The FCA says the current reporting setup is bloated, repetitive, and not especially useful for spotting real risk. FRAME is meant to fix that by tailoring data collection to what the UK market actually needs, rather than forcing firms to produce reams of information that regulators struggle to act on. Better data, less paperwork. That’s the pitch. Whether it delivers is another question, but the logic is pretty clear: if you collect smarter, you don’t need to collect as much.
AIFMD Rules From 2013 Get a Long-Overdue Rewrite
Part of what’s slowing things down is age. The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive rules — AIFMD, if you want the acronym — date back to 2013. That’s not ancient history, but it’s old enough that the market has shifted considerably underneath them. The FCA’s proposal would update those rules to make them more flexible and better suited to how UK fund managers actually operate today. Standards for firms serving retail clients would stay firm. The regulator is clear on that. But the broader framework would get more room to breathe.
Simon Walls, executive director at the FCA, put the focus squarely on proportionality. Smaller firms, per Walls, need more freedom to innovate. A one-size-fits-all regime doesn’t serve them well, and it probably doesn’t serve the regulator well either — it creates compliance noise that drowns out genuine risk signals. The FCA’s argument is that by calibrating requirements to firm size and circumstance, supervision actually gets sharper, not looser.
Not everyone will believe that. Skeptics tend to argue that flexibility in regulation is a polite word for gaps. But the FCA’s framing is that proportionality and high standards aren’t mutually exclusive — you can have both if the rules are written carefully enough.
Remuneration Rules Head Into Consultation
There’s a separate consultation running on remuneration. The FCA wants to consolidate what are currently overlapping remuneration codes into a single, cleaner framework. The firms in scope include full-scope Alternative Investment Fund Managers, UCITS management companies, and non-SNI MIFIDPRU investment firms. It’s a fairly wide net.
The goal is to cut complexity without cutting safeguards. Right now, different codes apply to different firm types, and the overlap creates confusion and administrative drag. The FCA’s plan would replace that patchwork with something more coherent — one framework, clearer rules, fewer redundant requirements. Firms would still need to meet high standards. The regulator is explicit about that. But they’d spend less time figuring out which code applies to which activity before they can even start.
It’s worth noting what the FCA isn’t doing here. It’s not proposing to gut remuneration oversight or remove protections for clients. The consultation is about structure and clarity, not about weakening the substance of the rules. That distinction matters, especially for retail-facing firms where remuneration incentives can directly affect customer outcomes.
Deadlines and What Happens Next
Three consultation papers are now open. The UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers regime consultation runs until October 14, 2026. The Solo Remuneration Rules Reform consultation closes September 16, 2026. And the FRAME consultation paper has a deadline of September 22, 2026.
The FCA is asking for industry feedback before anything gets finalized. That’s standard practice, but it also means the proposals could shift. Stakeholders who think the FRAME requirements don’t go far enough — or go too far — have a window to say so. Same goes for the remuneration changes. The regulator says it’s genuinely open to input, and the multi-paper consultation structure seems designed to give different parts of the industry a clear lane to respond.
Asset management in the UK is a significant industry, and compliance costs aren’t trivial. Firms spend real money on reporting infrastructure, legal review, and regulatory headcount. If the FCA can shave £128 million off that annually without compromising oversight quality, that’s capital that can go elsewhere — into investment teams, into technology, into client service. The math is simple even if the execution isn’t.
What’s less clear is how quickly any of this takes effect once consultations close. The FCA didn’t specify an implementation timeline in the proposals, so firms probably shouldn’t expect immediate relief. Regulatory reform tends to move slowly even when everyone agrees on the direction.
Walls and the FCA seem to think the direction is right. Smarter data collection, updated AIFMD rules, consolidated remuneration codes. The £128 million figure is the headline, but the deeper argument is about building a regulatory framework that actually works for the UK market as it exists now — not as it existed in 2013.
The FRAME consultation deadline is September 22, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much will UK asset managers save under the FCA’s proposed reforms?
The FCA says the reforms could save UK asset managers £128 million per year, largely through simplified FRAME reporting requirements and updated AIFMD rules.
What is the deadline to submit feedback on the FCA’s AIFM regime consultation?
The feedback deadline for the UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers regime consultation is October 14, 2026. The Solo Remuneration Rules Reform closes September 16, 2026, and the FRAME consultation closes September 22, 2026.
