On April 27, the halls of the United States House of Representatives echoed with the sound of digital assets. Both the Financial Services Committee and the Agriculture Committee held simultaneous hearings on the topic, with nearly identical titles and overlapping discussions.

The Financial Services Committee, in its hearing “The Future of Digital Assets: Identifying the Regulatory Gaps in Digital Asset Market Structure,” heard from Davis Polk partner Zachary Zweihorn, who argued that “securities market structure laws and regulations do not align with digital asset securities.” He said that the current regulatory framework is insufficient and that Congress must provide clarity.

Meanwhile, the Agriculture Committee’s hearing, “Examining the Role of Digital Assets in Food and Agriculture,” featured testimony from industry experts who shared concerns about the potential of digital assets to disrupt the food and agriculture industry. One witness, the CEO of a blockchain-based agtech company, argued that “digital assets have the potential to revolutionize the way we produce and distribute food, but we must ensure that they are regulated properly to protect consumers and farmers.”

Despite the similar themes, lawmakers appeared to be seeing double, with some even expressing confusion about which hearing they were attending. “I thought I was in the wrong room for a moment,” one congressman quipped.

The hearings come as regulators and lawmakers in the US grapple with how to regulate digital assets, which have become increasingly popular among retail and institutional investors. The lack of clear regulatory guidance has created uncertainty for investors and businesses alike, leading some to call for greater clarity and oversight.

In response to the hearings, crypto advocates have argued that overly strict regulation could stifle innovation and harm the US economy. They have called for a balanced approach that provides sufficient oversight while allowing the industry to grow and thrive.

As the hearings came to a close, it remained unclear what, if any, concrete actions Congress would take. But one thing was certain: crypto had taken over the House committees, leaving lawmakers seeing double and wondering what the future would hold for this rapidly-evolving industry.