BNB $606.01 +0.18%
XRP $1.36 +0.01%
ETH $2,207.38 -0.20%
BTC $71,871.42 +0.68%
BNB $606.01 +0.18%
XRP $1.36 +0.01%
ETH $2,207.38 -0.20%
BTC $71,871.42 +0.68%
BREAKING
Crypto Exchanges

Ripple’s Legal Chief Calls for Clear SEC Rules to Accelerate XRP ETFs

SEC crypto rules

Community Trust ScoreVerified

92%
Real
Verified13 votes
Updated 11 months ago

Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, has made a strong appeal for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to provide clear and fair regulations on how cryptocurrencies, especially tokens like XRP, should be treated. His call comes as interest in XRP exchange-traded funds (ETFs) grows and legal clarity becomes essential for their timely introduction. Ripple aims to ensure XRP is not unfairly held back compared to other crypto assets amid regulatory uncertainty.

The Importance of Regulatory Clarity for XRP ETFs

XRP has gained significant attention recently as investors and institutions look to gain exposure through ETFs, which can make the asset easier to buy and sell within traditional financial markets. However, without clear rules from the SEC, these funds face delays or even potential rejection.

In a letter addressed to the SEC’s Crypto Task Force, Stuart Alderoty emphasized that the majority of cryptocurrencies traded on secondary markets should not be treated as securities. He argues this lack of clarity is one of the main barriers preventing XRP ETFs from becoming widely available. Alderoty’s stance reflects Ripple’s broader effort to have XRP recognized as a distinct type of asset that deserves fair treatment, much like Bitcoin and Ethereum, which are generally not classified as securities.

Legal Backing From Recent Court Rulings

Alderoty cited the recent court ruling by Judge Torres in the ongoing SEC v. Ripple case as a key legal foundation supporting Ripple’s position. In this ruling, the court determined that XRP sales on public exchanges do not constitute securities transactions. This decision suggests that once tokens are sold on open markets, they should no longer be treated under the same strict securities laws as traditional investment contracts.

Further supporting this view, Alderoty referenced a legal paper authored by attorney Lewis Cohen, which states that a token should only be considered a security if there is a clear contractual relationship between the original buyer and seller. In cases where tokens are freely traded on exchanges, this relationship does not exist, meaning these transactions fall outside securities regulation.

Why Congress Should Shape Crypto Law

One of Alderoty’s key points is that the SEC should not act alone in defining the rules for cryptocurrencies. He urges Congress to step in and create a legal framework that is specifically designed to address the unique nature of digital assets.

According to Alderoty, existing securities laws were crafted decades ago for traditional financial products and do not fit well with decentralized cryptocurrencies. As a result, regulators often apply outdated rules, causing confusion and unnecessary delays.

By having Congress establish clear laws tailored to the crypto industry, companies and investors would gain better guidance. This approach would prevent regulatory agencies from exceeding their authority by imposing rules that were never intended for digital assets. Alderoty argues that only lawmakers, through formal legislation, can provide the consistent clarity that the crypto market desperately needs.

Ripple’s ‘Network Maturity’ Test: A New Way to Define Tokens

In addition to calling for congressional action, Ripple proposed a new concept called the ‘network maturity’ test to help determine whether a token should be classified as a security.

This test looks at several factors, such as the size and age of the project, how decentralized the network is, and how widely control over the token is distributed among users.

According to Ripple, a token should only be treated as a security if two conditions are met at the same time:

  1. The original promises made by the issuer have not yet been fulfilled.

  2. The current token holder retains legal rights tied to those promises.

If these conditions are not met, the token should be considered separate from the original investment contract and not treated as a security. This approach is designed to distinguish mature, fully functioning networks from early-stage projects that might still be subject to securities laws.

This ‘network maturity’ test is seen as a practical way to resolve the legal uncertainty around XRP and other tokens, which could pave the way for new ETFs and broader market adoption.

Industry-Wide Demand for Fairer Crypto Regulations

Ripple’s request is part of a growing movement within the crypto industry to seek clearer and more reasonable regulations. Many industry groups, including the Blockchain Association, have called on the SEC to stop applying traditional finance rules to cryptocurrencies. They argue that such regulations stifle innovation and create unfair disadvantages for crypto projects compared to other financial products.

Large investment firms, such as BlackRock, have also engaged with the SEC’s Crypto Task Force to advocate for better regulatory frameworks. The involvement of these major players highlights how critical clear rules are for the future growth of digital assets.

Why This Matters for Investors and the Market

For investors, the arrival of XRP ETFs would offer a simpler and more accessible way to gain exposure to the token without needing to manage wallets or navigate cryptocurrency exchanges. ETFs also tend to attract institutional investors who are required to operate within regulated financial products.

A clear regulatory path would help reduce the uncertainty that currently surrounds XRP and similar digital assets. This clarity could boost confidence and lead to more widespread adoption.

Moreover, fair treatment of XRP compared to other assets would help maintain a level playing field in the crypto market. Without it, investors could miss out on opportunities or face higher risks due to inconsistent rules.

Looking Ahead

The SEC’s stance on crypto remains a central factor for the industry’s future. Ripple’s call for clear, congressionally guided rules reflects a desire to move past years of uncertainty and conflicting interpretations.

If Congress takes up this challenge, it could lead to a new era of regulation that balances innovation with investor protection. Meanwhile, Ripple’s ‘network maturity’ test offers a practical framework that could be adopted to assess tokens fairly.

For now, XRP holders and crypto enthusiasts alike watch closely as Ripple continues to push for legal clarity that could open the door to XRP ETFs and broader acceptance in traditional financial markets.

Community Trust IndexModerate Confidence
92%
Real
Real92%8%Fake
13 community signals

James Thorp

James Thorp is a passionate crypto journalist from South Africa specializing in Litecoin, Dash, and emerging digital assets. With years of experience covering the crypto markets, James delivers in-depth analysis and breaking news on altcoins, blockchain adoption, and decentralized payment networks for The Currency Analytics.

Related Stories